Bold and unexpected, the United States has extended invitations to at least seven additional countries to join President Donald Trump’s newly established "Board of Peace" aimed at addressing the ongoing situation in Gaza. This initiative represents a significant ambition for a more expansive role in global governance. Among those accepting the invitation are Hungary and Vietnam.
According to a U.S. official who spoke anonymously, a financial commitment of $1 billion guarantees permanent membership on this board, compared to a temporary three-year position that has no financial prerequisite. The funds raised through this initiative are earmarked for the reconstruction efforts in Gaza, highlighting the board's focus on tangible outcomes.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, a staunch ally of Trump within Europe, confirmed his participation through statements made by Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó on state radio. Likewise, To Lam, the chief of Vietnam’s Communist Party, has also announced acceptance of the invitation, as indicated by a statement from the Vietnamese foreign ministry.
India is among the countries that have received an invitation, as revealed by a senior official familiar with the matter, who requested anonymity since this information has yet to be publicly disclosed.
In addition to India, Jordan, Greece, Cyprus, and Pakistan have also announced they were invited. Meanwhile, Canada, Turkey, Egypt, Paraguay, Argentina, and Albania have already indicated their inclusion in the invitation list. The total number of nations invited remains unclear, which adds an element of intrigue to the unfolding situation.
Stay informed about the latest developments by following AP News on our WhatsApp channel.
The official announcement unveiling the complete list of board members is anticipated shortly, likely coinciding with the upcoming World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
The board will play a crucial role in overseeing the next phases related to Gaza, particularly as the ceasefire established on October 10 enters its more complex second stage. This phase includes the formation of a new Palestinian committee in Gaza, the introduction of an international security force, disarmament initiatives targeting Hamas, and extensive rebuilding of the war-torn region.
In letters circulated last Friday to various world leaders, Trump pitched the Board of Peace as a pioneering approach to resolving global conflicts. This venture may pose a challenge to the United Nations Security Council, which is the most authoritative entity created post-World War II. The Security Council, composed of 15 members, has faced obstacles from U.S. vetoes that have hindered decisive actions regarding the situation in Gaza. Furthermore, the influence of the U.N. has waned due to substantial funding cuts from the Trump administration and other contributors.
Trump's invitation letters highlighted the Security Council's endorsement of a 20-point Gaza ceasefire plan, which includes the establishment of this board. These letters have been shared on social media by several invitees, showcasing the initiative's broad reach.
It's worth noting that the White House recently announced the formation of an executive committee responsible for realizing the vision of the Board of Peace. However, Israel expressed objections to this committee on the grounds that it was not coordinated with them, a rare instance of public criticism toward Washington from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office.
Key figures in this executive committee include U.S. Secretary of State Rubio, Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner (Trump's son-in-law), former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, World Bank President Ajay Banga, and Deputy National Security Adviser Robert Gabriel. Additionally, an Israeli billionaire, Yakir Gabay, and representatives from ceasefire monitors Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey, which maintains a complicated relationship with Israel but has constructive ties with Hamas, are also involved. Turkey's role could be pivotal in encouraging Hamas to relinquish control and agree to disarmament in Gaza.
As this situation evolves, what do you think about the implications of forming such a board? Could it effectively address the complexities surrounding the Gaza conflict, or might it create further tensions in international relations? Share your thoughts in the comments!
